Posts Tagged competition
The New DIY, Community Enterprise: “Atoms are the New Bits”
Posted by Billy in Business Theory & Strategy, Entrepreneurship on January 25, 2010
Well, Chris Anderson over at WIRED just published yet another article that is sure to get its fair share of praise. I’m sure it will gain a following and eventually be another book, following up “Free” and “The Long Tail“, both of which essentially started as articles in the mag. I will start by saying I’m a fan of Chris and his work. Those two books are some of my favorite business-ish books. Well, on to the article. This latest incarnation of thought is titled “The New Industrial Revolution” as it is emblazoned on the cover of the February 2010 issue, or “Atoms are the New Bits” as titled within (I don’t know what they want it called). The line of thought in this piece can be seen not only in Chris’s previous works but many strains of it can be seen throughout WIRED over the past few years. One of the key points that I’d like to highlight regards community & open-source development.
As seen in both Free and The Long Tail, community and open-source are the future of industry, advancement, and entrepreneurship. Even large, blue chips are taking part to some degree. Take Microsoft’s decisions to open beta-test its latest Windows and Office packages as an example. Other companies are entirely based on these community participation models. This free or near-free participation and approach has been tested, and proven, with the web and the constant content generation found there. Now, as can be interpolated from the article title, the open-source and open availability of these digital bits is being translated into near-free atoms! Actual physical products and goods are the next step to prove the concept of opensource. As we translate all the content, development, and innovation of the web into physical products, entrepreneurial opportunity will explode and prices, competition, and innovation will accelerate at levels unseen. Now, resistance will obviously occur, but pressing forward will yield tremendous return. Threadless is one company that is a common example of this opensource bits-to-atoms process, and a good one at that. They have demonstrated the win-win possibilities of the model in creating not only more unique, high-quality products but at reasonable prices with low-overhead, high profit business returns. This is only the beginning, of course, as Chris introduces us to much more complex possibilities than t-shirts.
Take Local Motors as an example that he mentions. They have actually begun production on a car that was designed and voted on by a community, in fashion of Threadless’ t-shirts. It will be built mostly using “after-market” parts and assembled individually as orders come in. Interestingly, Local Motors follows a model described in another WIRED article found back in June here. Currently Local Motors is coming out as a niche company, giving little competition to the major car conglomerates but that will likely change as Local Motors develops or others come into the game. This is only the beginning! Local’s design-to-market turn around is a distant dream to any detroit competition. As Chris states:
the company says it can take a new vehicle from sketch to market in 18 months, about the time it takes Detroit to change the specs on some door trim.
Even better is the open availability of the design plans under creative commons license. This allows components, add-ons, mods, and more to be created by anybody, unveiling countless other business possibilities. This is just one example of companies taking technology, community, and open-source to the world of physical products, to “atoms”. Many other examples may not scale like Local Motors nor have the desire to do so. The fact is many small entrepreneurial ventures, with today’s technology and tools, have the opportunity to compete with the behemoths or simply fill niches that are untouchable by them. It is a beautiful thing to behold. And we aren’t talking about the digital realm here. This is manufacturing, production, products, this is atoms! With simple tools such as 3D printers (for less than a grand), access to custom limited-run manufacturing at remarkably affordable prices (thanks again internet), and open community feedback, the opportunity pool is much deeper than it used to be! Even nuclear power is being approached with this technique as I discussed here regarding yet another WIRED article. Like I said, this theme can be seen throughout their articles over the last while.
So what does all this mean for the entrepreneur? Well, if you haven’t picked it up already, its all about endless opportunity and open, community development of ideas! With that in mind, what do you think? Any other great examples of similar business models in use? Let me know!!
The Importance of Risk
Posted by Billy in Business Theory & Strategy, Entrepreneurship on November 3, 2009
Risk is an interesting beast. Generally speaking, the goal of each entrepreneur and investor is to mitigate risk to as near zero as possible. The less risk that exists the better, or at least, the less risk you personally must take on, the better. This is a fine policy that any savvy businessperson demonstrates. Interestingly, risk plays an important role when viewed from the macroeconomic perspective. On the micro level, we are all trying to eliminate it, but from the greater macro level, it is an important regulator and guide to innovation and progress. To artificially eliminate risk poses some interesting side effects that ultimately are undesired. Forms of artificial risk elimination would include government policy and intervention, public incentives and credits, promises of government support and bailout, etc. These forms of risk mitigation are immediately accepted by most who are offered but is it really for the best? Read the rest of this entry »
Sustainability of Entrepreneurship
Posted by Billy in Business Theory & Strategy, Entrepreneurship, Featured on October 15, 2009
Sustainability is a common term, often referring to some energy-efficient lifestyle choice or other “green” concept. The goal being to create lifestyles, energies, and other things that are, yes, sustainable over the long term. Using renewable resources that won’t wound the world more than it helps. Sustainability is really the ability of any concept to continue onward running on its own production and energy. In physics, the ultimate in sustainability would be a “perpetual motion machine“. Although these don’t exist and even violate laws of thermodynamics, they would be the ultimate example of sustainable ideas. They utilize energy they create to fuel themselves with 100% efficiency.
In the movement to affect world change, to progress society forward, to enhance the lives of those around us, from the poorest poor to the richest rich, sustainability can be a very valuable trait to any good strategy. If it is temporary, like a loaf of bread to a starving person, it is good, but if it gives someone a lifetime of bread through seeding and farming, it is great and sustainable.
The greatest sustainable concept: Entrepreneurship
One of the reasons I am passionate about entrepreneurship is its uncanny ability to strive for sustainability. Read the rest of this entry »
Netflix goal is more “net”flix, not “DVD”flix
Posted by Billy in Technology, Trends & Ideas, Uncategorized on September 24, 2009
I am somewhat a tech junkie for those who don’t know. Although I may not always have the newest coolest gadgets, I’m simply fascinated by advancements, innovations, and breakthroughs in technology. Right now Netflix is of interest to me as they continue against the grain of good ol’ fashioned cable. Among the leaders of the internet TV movement, they are spearheading the campaign to unlimited, on-demand content availability via the web. Needless to say, I like it! I’ve been impressed with companies like redbox and their business model for simple, cost-effective dvd availability but as with much of today, these other concepts are simply side roads on the path to our new cloud reality. In Wired magazine’s latest issue, they highlight Netflix’ bold moves and risks here.
Hastings [CEO] planned to one day deliver the entire recorded output of Hollywood, instantly and in high definition, to any screen, anywhere…
Netflix has taken the boldest step yet toward a world in which consumers, not programmers, determine not only what they watch but when, where, and how. The dream of routing around cable companies just may be in sight…
It is odd, in an era when the Internet seems able to worm its way into every part of life, that nearly all of us still watch television the old-fashioned way, piped over cable or beamed in by satellite and available only in bloated packages of channels programmed by network executives…
That’s not to say there are not obstacles, even substantial ones. Cable companies are beginning to make attempts with various web-based offerings attempting to route out not only Netflix but the internet TV movement, especially the “free” side of that movement. Read the rest of this entry »
Freemium Future, Business Model Evolution: Free to Fee
Posted by Billy in Business Theory & Strategy, Entrepreneurship on September 14, 2009
The world of web 2.0 and tech startups have revealed the business model of the future, or maybe the now? I mean, they’ve been around for a while now but more and more are hitching a ride on the “free” train as we move forward into the future. This is particularly true of web-based products and services. Terms such as “Freemium” are being coined that describe the idea of free services with paid upgrades. Other companies, such as google, facebook, twitter, etc. are nearly 100% free and setting a standard of freedom (wow, you can really ‘pun’ it up with this whole free thing). Seth Godin has several posts regarding this model such as here. Others, like Wired’s Chris Anderson have even written books on this concept here. Chris shared his thoughts on this concept in several interviews and articles as well, as has Godin, that take the idea of offering abundance for free and scarcity for fee. You can essentially get the entire monthly magazine of Wired online for free, or you can pay and get the well postured, premium, hard copy magazine for a fee. I’m a subscriber, even though it is free online. I just like the feel of the mag. Entrepreneur.com recently had an article on this concept as well here. An exerpt:
On the Web, services such as Google, Facebook, and Twitter are the undisputed kings of free, providing robust services at no charge to users. But a host of other companies use free in a much more traditional way–as an enticement for paid upgrades. The model is known as freemium, and while it may not make headlines, proponents say it can make millions.
Unfortunately, finding the right balance between free and paid in the freemium model can leave a new business in uncharted waters, with few hard and fast rules to follow.
There are many companies paving the way and defining their version of the rules quite successfully. Among those in the article are 37Signals, Beanstock, and Posterous. These are all web companies.
So, how can a company that is not specifically a web-company take advantage of “Free” or create its own freemium business model? In today’s world, nearly all companies are “web” companies in one form or another. It may be for marketing only, and that is fine. This window to the web is what makes freemium possible, even for non-web-centric companies. The reason the web is the key is due to low cost, no overhead, distribution opportunities. It costs too much to do freemium outside of the web (in most cases). When software can be developed once and distributed to limitless end users at nearly zero cost, it makes sense to look to the web. For these non-web-centric companies, it may look like offering online courses, guides, e-books, and management tools for a do-it-yourself version of your particular product or service, the up-sell being to actually buy the product or service which is much easier and better that stumbling through on your own. Other companies may create online webinars, seminars, and other informational free products that actually provide value while sharing the possibilities of the premium services and products.
Another key to free is finding alternative ways of revenue generation while offering your primary service free. This has been Google’s model from the beginning. Everything they offer is free with the opportunity to sell advertising, data-mine their substantial user base, and more. Looking for creative alternatives to revenue is powerful and ought to be explored regardless of one’s chosen business model. Just be careful to not overdue the ads, the easiest and most common form of alternative revenue. Get creative instead.
It is exciting to see the new world of free develop as technology enhances the ability to distribute product and services so easily. It makes everyone’s life better as us end users can get tons of great, free stuff while taking advantage of some premium offerings and companies are getting the distribution and viral growth they need to succeed, a great win-win.
Any input on freemium models, possibilities, or ideas?
Coopetition… What is it?
Posted by Billy in Business Theory & Strategy, Entrepreneurship on August 19, 2009
The concept of coopetition is one I’ve heard a fair amount of over the last few years. It is a word-mash of cooperation and competition that implies just that, a level of cooperation with your competition. A recent post by Startup Professionals Musings gives a little insight into the idea and a few thoughts on doing it effectively. Here are some examples given there.
- Cost sharing and scale economies. A common type of coopetition is where companies work together on parts of their business where they believe they can minimize common costs, and not jeopardize their unique attributes. For instance, many car companies share major components to reduce costs, yet compete vigorously on the end product.
- Best of both creates a new market. Your competitor has strengths (maybe sales), and you have a different strength (maybe technology), appealing to overlapping segments. A strategic combination can win in a third segment, which neither of you could do alone in the same timeframe, or at the same cost.
- Up-sell related products after the initial sale. If your customers would benefit by having both of your products, you might negotiate the opportunity to include your competitor’s product inside your own box, or vice versa. This is called up-selling, or cross-up-selling, and both parties share the profits.
- Integrate products and services. If your competitor has a similar product that could complement your own, you might consider arranging a deal where both you and your competitor would offer an integrated bundle, or new product. This, like an up-sell, increases the sales volume of both parties.
- Cross endorsement. If your “competitor” isn’t really competing with your direct market, you can refer business to each other without anyone losing customers. Affiliate marketing might actually be one of the more effective (and easier) ways to partner with someone else in the industry. Online, this starts with link exchanges.
- Possible investor. Once you have established your credibility and value, a strategic partnership may lead to other business relationships. They may have the finances you need, and be ready to invest in a business area they know. Also this competitor will have become a prime exit strategy alternative.
Some organizations a groups lean on a more cooperative model while others are more competitive. I have been parts of entrepreneurial groups that continually sought cooperative solutions in the marketplace which, in many cases, created new, open-minded, relatively creative opportunities for those involved. Sometimes, however, you will still compete at some level. This is not a bad thing of course as it pushes all to continually improve the offering as to performance and cost alike. The beauty of coopetition is the opportunity to elevate both companies through common strategy, in other words, no loser. Wikipedia gives a few examples and explanation here. There are also books such as:
These are all good resources and I would say all entrepreneurs ought to look at cooperative opportunities that may enhance their growth, open up new possibilities, and ultimately increase your bottom line.




Twitter
LinkedIn
Facebook
Youtube
RSS